IRC-Galleria

Uusimmat blogimerkinnät

Selaa blogimerkintöjä

"No fossils in Finland" :DLauantai 30.01.2016 20:13

I'll still look for better pictures ... of things that lived. This is the Doomsday: dead wake up. Now I got it, why the animals are inside a charnia: It is made of charnias (as we are, too). One cell-group = one charnia-form. When they died... I'm not sure what happened... Maybe it went to pieces... maybe it had a transformation... to be a new and better... that would mean life (forever). I have these crazy over-edge ideas. It's not so crazy. There are mysteries in that life.
Stretched pancake hangs on a rocket.




(If the "Dark Matter" has left its root but nothing else, the matter is clear as bläck: it was relative to water-bear, and when others were boiled, this one woke up and started walking. :D
One cannot say with this one photo, was there really some thing between the rocks. I think that there was. Someone will be jumping on those rocks in the next Summer.)


Himalaja. Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@28.8099162,87.2930919,1221a,20y,180h/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

Not far from Mount Everest.Lauantai 30.01.2016 20:11

I may have changed North to "South". :) Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@28.8099162,87.2930919,1221a,20y,180h/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi



It was just an idea, connecting "rivers", possible net, and the "curtains of mountains". Hardly this place is the low edge of a mountain (where there often are sort of "curtains"). Isn't it funny, that mountains are complicated things, hard to understand, once been living. Englishmen could go and sound and probe the cone (with the same equipment, that they used in Janakkala & in Stonehenge). Contents... if that is not a mushroom, then it's some egg- or larva-pack. Or both).
Loc: same as above

Seems a bit like river sucking... as in the picture above, too.

Loc: same as above

Andes things ...Lauantai 30.01.2016 20:05

Beautiful different things, Andes. They look like still living. Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6852068,-69.9795364,2591m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi



(same as above) Planty and rooty, isn't it? Do I see wrong, or do the "root-sacks" contain different species?? Why are different species here and there in the same sacks? It shared itself to many, different? Or it got their genes somewhere? They put their genes into the sack? It got them from water? These are big mysteries, all these sacks, containing different individuals. They may have not only be born from the same sack, but different adults may have closed themselves into a same sack, when death=time for new generation comes near naturally or violently. This is what has come to my mind, when I have watched pictures of them. I don't know and I don't mind of what may be the known facts about genetics and stuff. They, who have that knowledge, it's their job to find out what really happened. Maybe "the individuals" are some cell groups... they work as parts of an individual... if you look at human skin, it is charnias. We are charnias. We are made of "a couple of" charnias, that work together, just as the charnias in this picture form roots. <-- perhaps!



Pool, or moist soil. What if the pink things are alive (and old kind) ? Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6412744,-69.9148658,200m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

Andes and HimalajaLauantai 30.01.2016 19:59

Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6483469,-70.0335922,1672m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi
If there are villages, roads and buildings, they are not marked in Google's map. I'd bet that's all done by nature. Cannot be sure.



https://www.google.fi/maps/@-17.183976,-69.8557617,2631m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi
Round gray, a bit to South-West from the center, is "sacked"/bonded (as usually there are almost every thing). Is it a normal/usual way to be, protecting when trouble for example because of hot, cold, or dryness, or are the sacks made crazily all the time for reproduction whereever possible?



A view to Himalaja Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@28.8099162,87.2930919,1221a,20y,180h/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

6 new pics. Andes.Torstai 21.01.2016 05:41

It rises atleast 150 metres from surface, I'd guess. Not sure, but it could...
https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6551823,-69.9734118,431m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

I'd rather send a robot into that pool than of a human.
https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6415977,-69.9143669,200m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

Magic lamp. I call those pipe-fastenings "machinery". (I think I've seen such in Mars, too. they're there in Mars too: primitive life of "leaves with a hole in the center" and primitive life of "machinery"-joints between units. Plus, p.life of charnias. There are, among others, charnias, that are unfastened, with kind of a cube-bottom. I mean: there have been.)
https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6308489,-69.9443151,536m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

Kuin kaunis laulu. Taivaallinen kaunis "viulu-laulu". :)
https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6998289,-70.0087626,2530m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

Kauniita hahtuvia. Putkenpätkät... Multipart-packages...
Kaikki on kuin olisi kuollut eilen - ei, vaan tänään. Tai kuin eivät olisi kuolleetkaan. Kyllähän ne kuolleita kai ovat?! Mutta joskus elivät. Nämä eivät kyllä näytä alkuunkaan kiveltä eivätkä hiekalta.
https://www.google.fi/maps/@-16.6852068,-69.9795364,2591m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

________________________________________________
Haa! Uusi teoria kalvoon kääriytyneestä kuolemanjoesta ... tai ei kummoista... jotain siihen liittyvää. Ehkä. Kun kuvia tutkii, niin joitakin asioita saattaa valjeta.
_________________________________________________
I FOUND SOMETHING UNBELIEVABLE.
WHO MADE THE NET ?
STEW-ART

Ne ovat suuremmat pedot, jotka käyttävät sen ruumismassan... oletan. Kun katsotaan vähän kauempaa, ovat yksiköt suurempia. Verkko saattaa olla suurempi, kuin tämä "joki". Se taitaa olla kahden tuollaisen mötkyläreunan väli, se iso verkko. En tiedä, onko kukaan koskaan tiennyt mitään noista. Kun kaikki vaan ovat luulleet, että kuolleet jauheet ovat kasautuneet. Vai magmanako ne jopa noita vuoria ovat pitäneet. Ne ovat kaikki kylläkin eläimiä. Se ei ole asia, jota ei voi todistaa. Sama kuin väittäisi, että muumioitunut ihminen on mutaa tai magmaa. Verkko VOISI olla muodostuvan kotelon alkusäikeet... miksi otukset on ahdettu verkkoon... kun ympärillä on isompia, ja kun muistaa mitä Alpeilla on, niin, ne syövät ne. Monen kilometrin kokoiset verkkokalastajat syövät ja syöttävät saaliinsa toukilleen. Taitaa olla niin. Alla oleva suuri ansaputki saattaa olla vain suuren verkon minimaalinen kapea reuna, olkoon reuna, mutta on ehkä joki, joka on ehkä pussittanut itsensä sitkeään limakalvon sisään, mikä johtui ehkä karmeasta määrästä isoja eläviä, kuolevia ja kuolleita eläimiä - heidän juomajokensa on mädäntyneiden ruumiiden liemi, jonka luulisi tappavan melkein yhtä tehokkaasti kuin veden puutteenkin. Vai oliko se kenties "sopivaa ravintoa"...! Kuoleman joet ovat järvien välillä, ja järvet olivat pienentyneet ja täyteen ahdettu jättieläimillä. Alla olevat kuvat ovat lähikuvia. Noissa ei näy niitä suurimpia kalastajia. (Ajattelin kyllä, että onko se 2 kalvoputki-ansan välisen alueen verkko Googlen piirtämä, tai muinaisten maanviljelijöiden, mutta... ehkä se VOISI olla karttaohjelmien piirtämä??? Ei näytä siltäkään, suurimmassa osassa aluetta.) Laitan kuvaa. (Anteeksi että mainitsen ufot tässä, mutta ufot näyttivät kuoleman joen sekä sumpputaidetta. Kuoleman joki on siellä missä on kuolematon ja joki.Koski. Se on unbreakable... eiköhän palat ala jymähdellä paikoilleen vähitellen... :D Sumppu on siellä missä on Pyyvaara ja Raatteentie. <-- täydellinen järvien kaari sulkee jotakuinkin täydellisen järvien-suorakulman.) Kyllä minä tiedän että sumppu ei ole ansa, vaikka katiska on melkein sama, ja on ansa.

https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.8701045,-70.4742125,391m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi
By "the net" I don't mean this sack long like a river full of animals, but larger net, there, in the other pics.


The net can be seen clearly also here. I thought first that stripes were on animals' skin. Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.854045,-70.4878176,408m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi


The thing is here: a big net. This picture is a negative. The big light blue, that is cut by the picture's edges, is 600-700m long part of a dozens of kilometres long transparent river-sack-trap (or whatever it is - long border-sack of a larger net-trap). The net on the left may belong to the same, but goes on much broader to west - closing a bit bigger animals inside - until reaches the same kind of a long narrow river-looking sack. Location same as above.

6 new pics. Andes mountainsTorstai 21.01.2016 05:38

The death-river. P.S. I don't know, why are these narrow long river-sacks there. May be parts of a bigger net ...Read newer texts above. Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.8709711,-70.4731549,389m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi


Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.8753907,-70.4733496,383m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi



AndesMaanantai 18.01.2016 08:13

When I took a glance to the long white sack, found out, that one end ends to a very crowded pool-area (they possibly died because too little water and too much folks). Another end ends to a present lake. One branch goes to an area, where animals gathered to suck that sack. They died because lack of water. This theory came to mind, because there are marks of a community: They made the water pipe, for to give water to everybody! It makes sense. Some individual-resembling parts worked as tent-walls. The long white (water?) sack.. most visible part of the long sack is made of narrow charnia-parts, similar what I called "riukelo a´la viukelo" in Mars. I'm not sure of those, yet, but... looked like that. Yes this sounds totally ridiculous and crazy. Maybe the slimesack created itself accidently, not for a purpose... I have to check if they really worked as building parts of the water-pipe.
There are living building parts of community with Yorgia... that is a very old thing. Where ever you look at, there's co-operating where the ancient are in question. Sharing, joining, ... And flexibility in that what one can be.
_____________________________________
Marked locations, so nobody can say that they are not there nor that they are not that big. They are.

Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.9108331,-70.366226,1326m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi


Location: SAME AS ABOVE

(Unbelievable coincidences in fitting of the pictures' edges, when pasting ...)

Mountains. Andes.Maanantai 18.01.2016 08:09

Where black and light-gray "spider-legs" are, I had wroten there "a sack" in another picture, when looked at it from distance. Not a sack, not worms. It's those secrets of charnia-animals' side-leg-curtains (are those some charnia-larvas?) and inner beast-nails...
Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.9108331,-70.366226,1326m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi




Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.9108498,-70.3894355,648m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi



Is it the forfather of worms (parts)? And forfather of us (whole)? If that is animals' forfather, animals developed side by side with plants as creatures with roots. Are these animals REALLY only 65 million years old? This kind of animals should be much older. You really have to break the charnia-root's glass, go in, and take a proper rock-sample. :)
Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.9108331,-70.366226,1326m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi


______________________________________________________

Giants of AndesLauantai 16.01.2016 10:09

I check first these scenes that i have collected. But the magnif...gloriou.. wonderful silk-sack will be handled in the future.
This place (where I thought there might be unbelievable camouflaging for a beast as good as I am, but there wasn't :) -but, may have still been at some points... it would mean existence of a predator with good eyes). Many will say, that those are not animals. You will loose... :D Shiny small animal of 1km length down on the left. Gray ones in the right upper corner: animals, of course. Place should locate somewhere here: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.8419353,-70.4536445,5225m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi

"Cannot make difference..." those are all of charnia-origin. Bended, sacked, or so. I meant, that if one is already a mollusc, or one is already an insect in a sack, it's hard to understand who is who, and who makes an eggsack and who doesn't or doesn't anyone make an eggsack.... or are the larvas under mother or do dead parents transform to larvas or does 1 fetus come out of an eggsack or many or do those both happen depending on species?! Maybe should take some insect-book and start to study... &%#

There is unbelievable film-wall, white long sack, partly empty, partly full of animals. I cannot believe, that nobody has seen that. First I thought that it stands there and keeps big stoned fossiles up! :) Hardly so... but... there is a shadow of one, that is hanging in the air. I may be right, once again. Some of them are hell hanging in the air. Silky road for to make The Nature Document of nature documents. I wonder is it for catching animals, or some river's meaningless slime-hose... Hmm, animals try to reach the long silk-sack. They have died in lack of water !!!
(There are animals of nightmares: disgusting charnia has opened and fastened its mouth against the white sack-river. It may be a part of a whole "party-part" one. And the white foot on the green reaches itself from up there with a snake's body, sorry for that left it under another pic.)


Under there is a flat charnia, on it there's the bend or not bend spiky, the spiky's back curves as to a tub, and some "foot-package" sinks a bit into the tub? There's a big leaf, and someone made a package of small leaves (too hard to see, I should not have taken this view). Or is the whole "wagon" a creature, that has tentacles + eyes??!! White pile in the front area: necrophages? Isopod-related?, and a glimpse of a crab's claw?
Location: https://www.google.fi/maps/@-15.8870535,-70.5054297,5171m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fi